 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS |
|
Processor comparisons 15-02-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, MATLAB, 7zip, AIDA64, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, SuperPi, PCMark 10, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS or AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | 59% |
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 58% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 7840HS is 1% better than Ryzen 9 6980HS. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 7840HS | 57% |
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 100.5 | 97.3 | | Valorant | 114.2 | 110.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.0 | 61.9 | | Apex Legends | 107.4 | 103.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.7 | 82.9 | | Overwatch | 92.5 | 89.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.8 | 76.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.1 | 55.3 | | Warzone | 89.1 | 86.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.0 | 92.9 | | Valheim | 94.8 | 91.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | 156% |
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 156% |
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 211 | 261 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2865 | 2536 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 452 | 610 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6799 | 5559 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1095 | 1578 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18618 | 14146 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Single-Core | 2275 | 3379 | | Multi-Core | 30003 | 27970 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Single-Core | 1876 | 1643 | | Multi-Core | 12274 | 9105 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 09, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FP7 | | Core name | Phoenix | Rembrandt | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 6 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2)
LPDDR5/x (FP7, FP8) | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | 512KB | 512KB | | L2 cache | 8MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000955 (FP7r2)
100-000000964 (FP7)
100-000001129 (FP8)
| FP7:100-000000750 FP7r2:100-000000751
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 7840HS is 13% better than Ryzen 9 6980HS in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is better: 26
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS is better: 5
All the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
|
|
|
