|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Intel Core i9-12900F |
|
Processor comparisons 29-08-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Intel Core i9-12900F and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AIDA64, Blender, Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Handbrake, 3DMark, RealBench, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, Furmark, WPrime. Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900F or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | 79% |
Core i9-12900F | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 17% better than Core i9-12900F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | 69% |
Core i9-12900F | 59% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 122.4 | 104.5 | Valorant | 139.1 | 118.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 77.9 | 66.5 | Apex Legends | 130.8 | 111.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 104.3 | 89.1 | Overwatch | 112.7 | 96.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 96.0 | 81.9 | DOOM Eternal | 69.5 | 59.4 | Warzone | 108.5 | 92.6 | Assassin's Creed | 116.8 | 99.8 | Valheim | 115.5 | 98.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | 18% |
Core i9-12900F | 97% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900F is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 237 | 449 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 12717 | 4734 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 523 | 750 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 26998 | 10524 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1355 | 2661 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 80814 | 30285 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Single-Core | 2966 | 6936 | Multi-Core | 98413 | 51775 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Single-Core | 1584 | 1904 | Multi-Core | 33731 | 16188 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | sWRX8 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Chagall PRO | Alder Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 32 | 16 | Threads | 64 | 24 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 32MB | 12 MB | L3 cache | 256MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | y | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900F is 5% better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 16 more core than Core i9-12900F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900F is better: 14 The summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Intel Core i9-12900F before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Intel Core i9-12900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
| |
|