 |
Intel Core i9-12900F vs Intel Core i5-12400 |
|
Processor comparisons 28-09-2022
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-12900F vs Intel Core i5-12400 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as VeraCrypt, Gears 5, 7zip, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, PassMark, RealBench, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12400 or Intel Core i9-12900F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900F | 65% |
Core i5-12400 | 57% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900F is 12% better than Core i5-12400. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900F | 59% |
Core i5-12400 | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 104.5 | 97.5 | | Valorant | 118.8 | 110.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.5 | 62.0 | | Apex Legends | 111.6 | 104.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.1 | 83.1 | | Overwatch | 96.2 | 89.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.9 | 76.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 55.4 | | Warzone | 92.6 | 86.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 99.8 | 93.0 | | Valheim | 98.6 | 91.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900F | 97% |
Core i5-12400 | 91% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-12400 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 449 | 337 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4734 | 2465 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 750 | 808 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10524 | 5598 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2661 | 1889 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30285 | 18452 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Single-Core | 6936 | 4427 | | Multi-Core | 51775 | 25834 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Single-Core | 1904 | 1785 | | Multi-Core | 16188 | 9275 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Core i5-12400 | | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 12 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 6 | | Threads | 24 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900F is 13% better than Core i5-12400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900F has 10 more core than Core i5-12400. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900F is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12400 is better: 3
However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-12900F and Intel Core i5-12400 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-12900F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Intel Core i5-12400 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
