 |
AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 9224 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 9224 and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like SuperPi, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Prime95, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, Blender, RealBench, Furmark, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9224 or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7773X | 74% |
EPYC 9224 | 65% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 12% better than EPYC 9224. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7773X | 80% |
EPYC 9224 | 68% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.2 | 120.6 | | Valorant | 161.6 | 137.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 76.7 | | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 128.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 102.8 | | Overwatch | 130.9 | 111.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 94.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 68.5 | | Warzone | 126.0 | 106.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 115.1 | | Valheim | 134.1 | 113.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7773X | 16% |
EPYC 9224 | 27% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9224 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 130 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 6125 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 260 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 13002 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 670 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 33841 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Single-Core | 2797 | 1530 | | Multi-Core | 79901 | 49648 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Single-Core | 1385 | 1629 | | Multi-Core | 53124 | 31932 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Milan | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 24 | | Threads | 128 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF | 100-000000939
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9224 is 11% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 40 more core than EPYC 9224. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9224 is better: 11
Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7773X and AMD EPYC 9224 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9224 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
