 |
AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 9224 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 9224 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, SuperPi, 7zip, PassMark, UserBenchmark, RealBench, AIDA64, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Furmark, Blender, Prime95, VeraCrypt.
And how good the processors are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9224 or AMD EPYC 7402.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7402 | 64% |
EPYC 9224 | 65% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9224 is 1% better than EPYC 7402. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7402 | 67% |
EPYC 9224 | 68% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 118.6 | 120.6 | | Valorant | 134.7 | 137.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.5 | 76.7 | | Apex Legends | 126.7 | 128.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.1 | 102.8 | | Overwatch | 109.1 | 111.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.0 | 94.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.4 | 68.5 | | Warzone | 105.1 | 106.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.2 | 115.1 | | Valheim | 111.8 | 113.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7402 | 20% |
EPYC 9224 | 27% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9224 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7402 as it consumes less power: 180W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7402 |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 146 | 130 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6023 | 6125 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 260 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12766 | 13002 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 674 | 670 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33194 | 33841 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7402 |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Single-Core | 2174 | 1530 | | Multi-Core | 48691 | 49648 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7402 |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Single-Core | 1102 | 1629 | | Multi-Core | 29978 | 31932 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7402 |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 24 | | Threads | 48 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 180 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204 GByte/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000046
100-100000046WOF | 100-000000939
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7402 is 10% better than EPYC 9224 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7402 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9224 is better: 27
Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7402 and AMD EPYC 9224 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7402 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9224 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
