Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 9634 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 9634

Processor comparisons   19-03-2023
   Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 9634 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like VeraCrypt, Gears 5, AIDA64, Prime95, MATLAB, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, SuperPi, Blender, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Furmark, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, WPrime.
   And how good the processors are in games:
  • Valorant
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Fortnite
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Halo Infinite
  • Overwatch
  • Borderlands 3
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Last Man Standing
  • Fallout 76
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Apex Legends
  • Death Stranding
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valheim
  • Cyberpunk 2077

   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9634 or AMD EPYC 7402.


 
AMD EPYC 7402
AMD EPYC 9634

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 740264% EPYC 963494%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9634 is 31% better than EPYC 7402. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 740267% EPYC 963494%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite118.6165.4
Valorant134.7188.0
Cyberpunk 207775.5105.3
Apex Legends126.7176.7
Call of Duty Warzone101.1141.0
Overwatch109.1152.3
Red Dead Redemption 293.0129.7
DOOM Eternal67.494.0
Warzone105.1146.6
Assassin's Creed113.2157.9
Valheim111.8156.0
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 740220% EPYC 963415%
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7402 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9634 since it has less power consumption: 180W vs. 290W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 9634
Cinbench 15 Single-core146445
Cinbench 15 Multi-core602317927
Cinbench 20 Single-core476827
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1276637987
Cinbench 23 Single-core6742016
Cinbench 23 Multi-core3319498767

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 9634
Single-Core21744237
Multi-Core48691144876

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 9634
Single-Core11021331
Multi-Core2997875930

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 9634
Announcement dateOctober 01, 2019November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP5
Core nameRomeGenoa
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 4
Generation24
Turbo Frequency3.35 MHz3.7 MHz
Frequency2.8 MHz2.25 MHz
Cores2484
Threads48168
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count56000 millions116000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)180 W290 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR5
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32004800
Memory bandwidth204 GByte/s460.8
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache128MB384MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000046
100-100000046WOF
100-000000797
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7402 is 19% better than EPYC 9634 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9634 has 60 more core than EPYC 7402. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7402 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9634 is better: 32
   Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7402 and AMD EPYC 9634 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7402 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9634 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7402 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 9634 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands