 |
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7402 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7402 and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 7zip, VeraCrypt, Prime95, AIDA64, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Gears 5, Blender, RealBench, Handbrake, PassMark, 3DMark, Furmark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7402 or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 7402 | 64% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7402 is 3% better than EPYC 7373X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 7402 | 67% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 118.6 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 134.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 75.5 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 126.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 101.1 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 109.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 93.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 67.4 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 105.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 113.2 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 111.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 7402 | 20% |
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7402 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 146 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 6023 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 476 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 12766 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 674 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 33194 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7402 | | Single-Core | 1311 | 2174 | | Multi-Core | 42034 | 48691 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7402 | | Single-Core | 1476 | 1102 | | Multi-Core | 24660 | 29978 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7402 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 3 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.35 MHz | | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 24 | | Threads | 32 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 56000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 180 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000508
100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000046
100-100000046WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 8% better than EPYC 7402 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7402 has 8 more core than EPYC 7373X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 7
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7402 is better: 24
However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 7402 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7402 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
