|
Qualcomm 205 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm 205 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Adreno 304. This performance comparison involves two processors: Qualcomm 205 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of chips in Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Qualcomm 205 or Exynos 7 Quad 7578 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQualcomm 205 | 2% |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Qualcomm 205 | 30% |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | 55% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQualcomm 205 | 1% |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Qualcomm 205 |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | Total score | 35062 | 35491 | CPU | 9817 | 9946 | GPU | 13329 | 13477 | MEM | 5612 | 5678 | UX | 6311 | 6394 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm 205 |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | Single-Core | 93 | 94 | Multi-Core | 428 | 433 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Qualcomm 205 |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR 2, LPDDR 3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 333 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 7 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is 26% better than Qualcomm 205 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 304 | Mali-T720 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 668 MHz | GFloPS | 19.2 | 22.71 | # of Cores | | 2 | # of Shader Units | 24 | | Display | 960 x 540 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 10.9 | 10.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 27.3 | 27.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 17.7 | 17.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 14.6 | 14.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.8 | 23.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 35.6 | 35.2 | Real Racing 3 | 22.1 | 35.4 | Sniper 3D | 33.6 | 33.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 24.8 | 24.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 25.7 | 25.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 21.2 | 24.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 3 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, MPEG-4, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | LTE Cat.4 2CA | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm 205 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is better: 25 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Qualcomm 205 and Exynos 7 Quad 7578, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Qualcomm 205 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|