|
Allwinner A523 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 |
|
Comparisons 13-06-2023 Full comparison data of Allwinner A523 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy A523 or Snapdragon 675.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA523 | 12% |
Snapdragon 675 | 12% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A523 | 53% |
Snapdragon 675 | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A523 |
Snapdragon 675 | Total score | 167563 | 169618 | CPU | 46909 | 47497 | GPU | 63678 | 64451 | MEM | 26807 | 27128 | UX | 30170 | 30521 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A523 |
Snapdragon 675 | Single-Core | 796 | 347 | Multi-Core | 3186 | 1460 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A523 |
Snapdragon 675 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4 up to 2400MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 1 MB | 16 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB | L3 cache | 16 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 675 is 9% better than A523 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC1 2EE | Adreno 612 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 540 | 398 | # of Cores | 3 | | # of Shader Units | | 256 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1080 x 2520 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.4 | 22.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 26.5 | 26.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 56.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 29.5 | 29.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.8 | 23.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 32.7 | 32.4 | Real Racing 3 | 98.9 | 113.2 | Sniper 3D | 73.8 | 73.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.9 | 101.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 73.7 | 65.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 79.3 | 79.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 25 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou, GLONASS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A523 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 is better: 18 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A523 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Snapdragon 675 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|