|
Allwinner A523 vs Rockchip RK3326S |
|
Comparisons 13-06-2023 Detailed compare data of Allwinner A523 vs Rockchip RK3326S, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2 etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy A523 or RK3326S.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A523 |
RK3326S | Total score | 167563 | 69863 | CPU | 46909 | 19570 | GPU | 63678 | 26547 | MEM | 26807 | 11185 | UX | 30170 | 12580 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A523 |
RK3326S | Single-Core | 796 | 106 | Multi-Core | 3186 | 316 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A523 |
RK3326S | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1500 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A35 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4 up to 2400MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | 667 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 16 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A523 is 16% better than RK3326S in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A523 has -4 more core than RK3326S. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC1 2EE | Mali-G31 2EE Dvalin | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 540 | 21.36 | # of Cores | 3 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 26.5 | 16.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 25.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 29.5 | 17.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.8 | 13.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 32.7 | 17.4 | Real Racing 3 | 98.9 | 32.6 | Sniper 3D | 73.8 | 56.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.9 | 30.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 73.7 | 29.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 79.3 | 35.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A523 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3326S is better: 6 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A523 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
RK3326S SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|