Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Google Tensor G2

Comparisons 08-03-2023

Comprehensive testing data of Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Google Tensor G2, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Samsung Exynos 1380 or Google Tensor G2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 1380

31%

Google Tensor G2

64%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 1380

89%

Google Tensor G2

85%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 1380

28%

Google Tensor G2

62%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 1380	Google Tensor G2
Total score	418841	888986
CPU	117285	248916
GPU	159165	337807
MEM	67014	142228
UX	75388	160015

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 1380	Google Tensor G2
Single-Core	750	1164
Multi-Core	2036	3194

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 1380	Google Tensor G2
Frequency	2400 MHz	2850 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	4 nm
Transistors count	4800 millions
Core configuration	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.34 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	8 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	3200
Memory bandwidth	44	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		1 MB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Google Tensor G2 is 15% better than Exynos 1380 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G68 MP5	Mali-G710 MP07
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	1026	1535.23
# of Cores	5	16
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.1	34.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.2	105.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.4	63.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	40.7	58.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	45.9	90.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	74.9	129.1
Real Racing 3	84.6	126.9
Sniper 3D	106.3	138.3
Need for Speed No Limits	67.7	88.3
Mortal Kombat X	64.5	91.1
CSR Racing 2	78.6	75.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP
Video Encoding FPS	120	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5300	Exynos Modem 5123
Download speed	3790 MBit/s.	9750 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1280 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo, GPS, Glonass, Beidou, SBAS, QZSS	Beidou, GLONASS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, NavIC enabled, NavIC
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 1380 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G2 is better: 32
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 1380 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 1380 specs and review.

Google Tensor G2 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Google Tensor G2 specs and review.