Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300

Comparisons   07-10-2022
   Detailed testing data of Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Google Tensor G2 or MediaTek Dimensity 1300.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Google Tensor G2

64%

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

57%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Google Tensor G2

85%

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Google Tensor G2

62%

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

54%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Google Tensor G2	MediaTek Dimensity 1300
Total score	888986	801200
CPU	248916	224335
GPU	337807	304453
MEM	142228	128197
UX	160015	144219

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Google Tensor G2	MediaTek Dimensity 1300
Single-Core	1164	1455
Multi-Core	3194	4766

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Google Tensor G2	MediaTek Dimensity 1300
Frequency	2850 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count		5800 millions
Core configuration	2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.34 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55	2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	4266
Memory bandwidth	51.2	32
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	32 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	320 KB
L3 cache	8 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is 5% better than Google Tensor G2 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G710 MP07	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	1535.23	504
# of Cores	16	9
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	34.2	31.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	105.5	94.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	63.4	56.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	58.9	52.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	90.7	81.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	129.1	117.1
Real Racing 3	126.9	113.7
Sniper 3D	138.3	125.5
Need for Speed No Limits	88.3	79.7
Mortal Kombat X	91.1	82.5
CSR Racing 2	75.6	68.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5123	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	9750 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	7500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, GLONASS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, NavIC enabled, NavIC	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G2 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Google Tensor G2 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Google Tensor G2 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 1300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 specs and review.