HiSilicon Kirin 990E vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 990E vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U, compare of GPUs Mali-G57 MC3 and Mali-G76 MP12.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 990E is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Dimensity 800U is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 990E or Dimensity 800U and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 990E

31%

Dimensity 800U

23%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 990E

75%

Dimensity 800U

76%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 990E

29%

Dimensity 800U

22%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 990E	Dimensity 800U
Total score	433894	329621
CPU	121487	92292
GPU	164888	125254
MEM	69424	52742
UX	78108	59341

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 990E	Dimensity 800U
Single-Core	929	738
Multi-Core	3068	2510

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 990E	Dimensity 800U
Frequency	2860 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	10300 millions
Core configuration	2x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 2x2.36 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.95 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	12 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	2133
Memory bandwidth	31.78	17.07
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache	512 KB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 990E is 16% better than Dimensity 800U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G76 MP12	Mali-G57 MC3
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	489.38	512
# of Cores	12	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.6	30.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	56.3	42.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.7	53.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.3	48.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	47.8	35.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	77.8	59.7
Real Racing 3	102.7	66.6
Sniper 3D	111.5	101.3
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	95.9
Mortal Kombat X	67.5	61.3
CSR Racing 2	64.6	58.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution		20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G NR	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	2300 MBit/s.	2300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1250 MBit/s.	1200 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	BeiDou B1I, QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 990E is better: 25
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 800U is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Kirin 990E and Dimensity 800U, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 990E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 990E specs and review.

Dimensity 800U SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 800U specs and review.