 |
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9174F |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9174F tests and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Blender, VeraCrypt, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, Handbrake, PassMark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Gears 5, SuperPi, Blender, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Prime95.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9174F or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 9174F | 66% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9174F is 6% better than EPYC 7373X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 9174F | 70% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 123.8 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 140.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 78.8 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 132.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 105.5 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 113.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 97.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 70.3 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 109.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 118.2 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 116.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 9174F | 18% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7373X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9174F as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 320W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 134 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 6722 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 277 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 14279 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 727 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 37179 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Single-Core | 1311 | 1672 | | Multi-Core | 42034 | 54549 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Single-Core | 1476 | 1781 | | Multi-Core | 24660 | 35081 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9174F | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Milan | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 16 | | Threads | 32 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 320 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000508
100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000796
100-100000796WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9174F is 25% better than EPYC 7373X in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9174F is better: 30
Although it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 9174F before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9174F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
