 |
Intel Core i7-11375H vs Intel Core i7-11370H |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-11375H vs Intel Core i7-11370H tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, Blender, 7zip, Handbrake, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, PCMark 10, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, VeraCrypt, PassMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11370H or Intel Core i7-11375H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-11375H | 53% |
Core i7-11370H | 53% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-11375H | 53% |
Core i7-11370H | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.3 | 94.2 | | Valorant | 107.1 | 107.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.0 | 59.9 | | Apex Legends | 100.7 | 100.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.3 | 80.3 | | Overwatch | 86.8 | 86.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.9 | 73.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.6 | 53.5 | | Warzone | 83.6 | 83.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.0 | 89.9 | | Valheim | 88.9 | 88.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-11375H | 176% |
Core i7-11370H | 176% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-11375H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 119 | 117 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1143 | 1120 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 279 | 273 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2562 | 2511 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 728 | 713 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6780 | 6644 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-11375H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Single-Core | 1624 | 1592 | | Multi-Core | 12370 | 12123 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-11375H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Single-Core | 1588 | 1588 | | Multi-Core | 6153 | 6074 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-11375H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Announcement date | January 20, 2021 | January 20, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Tiger Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 11 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 12 GT/s | 12 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 8200 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 30 W | 30 W | | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11375H is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11370H is better: 0
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-11375H and Intel Core i7-11370H before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-11375H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
Intel Core i7-11370H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
|
|
|
