|
Intel Core i3-11100B vs Intel Core i7-11370H |
|
Processor comparisons 26-06-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-11100B vs Intel Core i7-11370H and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like VeraCrypt, Blender, WPrime, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Furmark, 7zip, PCMark 10, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Gears 5, SuperPi, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11370H or Intel Core i3-11100B.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-11100B | 53% |
Core i7-11370H | 53% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-11100B | 53% |
Core i7-11370H | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Control, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.8 | 94.2 | Valorant | 106.6 | 107.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.7 | 59.9 | Apex Legends | 100.2 | 100.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.0 | 80.3 | Overwatch | 86.4 | 86.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.6 | 73.9 | DOOM Eternal | 53.3 | 53.5 | Warzone | 83.2 | 83.5 | Assassin's Creed | 89.6 | 89.9 | Valheim | 88.5 | 88.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-11100B | 76% |
Core i7-11370H | 176% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-11370H is more energy efficient than the Core i3-11100B as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 30W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-11100B |
Intel Core i7-11370H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 251 | 117 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 988 | 1120 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 665 | 273 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2441 | 2511 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1313 | 713 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5098 | 6644 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-11100B |
Intel Core i7-11370H | Single-Core | 4395 | 1592 | Multi-Core | 10199 | 12123 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-11100B |
Intel Core i7-11370H | Single-Core | 1497 | 1588 | Multi-Core | 5728 | 6074 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-11100B |
Intel Core i7-11370H | Announcement date | April 24, 2021 | January 20, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 12 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 3400 millions | 8200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 30 W | Memory type | Up to 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 4 MB | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-11100B is 8% better than Core i7-11370H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-11100B is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11370H is better: 23 All the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-11100B and Intel Core i7-11370H before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-11100B Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i7-11370H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
| |
|