Intel Core i7-11370H vs Intel Core i7-10750H

Processor comparisons   19-03-2021
   Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i7-11370H vs Intel Core i7-10750H and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like SuperPi, 7zip, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Handbrake, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, WPrime, Prime95, RealBench, Gears 5.
   And how good the CPUs are in games:

Valorant
Borderlands 3
DOOM: Eternal
Fallout 76
Rainbow Six Siege
Watch Dogs Legion
Grand Theft Auto V
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Apex Legends
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Cyberpunk 2077
Fortnite
Death Stranding
Halo Infinite
Valheim
Red Dead Redemption 2
Overwatch
Last Man Standing

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10750H or Intel Core i7-11370H.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Core i7-11370H

53%

Core i7-10750H

53%

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Core i7-11370H

53%

Core i7-10750H

53%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Control, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	94.2	94.5
Valorant	107.0	107.4
Cyberpunk 2077	59.9	60.2
Apex Legends	100.6	101.0
Call of Duty Warzone	80.3	80.6
Overwatch	86.7	87.0
Red Dead Redemption 2	73.9	74.1
DOOM Eternal	53.5	53.7
Warzone	83.5	83.8
Assassin's Creed	89.9	90.2
Valheim	88.8	89.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Core i7-11370H

176%

Core i7-10750H

93%

To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-11370H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10750H since it has less power consumption: 30W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	Intel Core i7-11370H	Intel Core i7-10750H
Cinbench 15 Single-core	117	204
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	1120	1216
Cinbench 20 Single-core	273	484
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	2511	2732
Cinbench 23 Single-core	713	1174
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	6644	7314

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i7-11370H	Intel Core i7-10750H
Single-Core	1592	2718
Multi-Core	12123	12654

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Core i7-11370H	Intel Core i7-10750H
Single-Core	1588	1257
Multi-Core	6074	6398

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

	Intel Core i7-11370H	Intel Core i7-10750H
Announcement date	January 20, 2021	January 01, 2020
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCBGA1440
Core name	Tiger Lake	Comet Lake
Architecture	x86	x86
Generation	11	10
Turbo Frequency	4.8 MHz	5 MHz
Frequency	3.3 MHz	2.6 MHz
Cores	4	6
Threads	8	12
Bus rate	12 GT/s	8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	10 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	8200 millions	6800 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	30 W	45 W
Memory type	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267	DDR4-2933
Max. Memory	64 Gb	128 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	45.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache	4 MB
L3 cache	12 MB	12 MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-11370H is 21% better than Core i7-10750H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-10750H has 2 more core than Core i7-11370H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11370H is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10750H is better: 25
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-11370H and Intel Core i7-10750H before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

Intel Core i7-11370H - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Core i7-11370H specs and review.

• Intel Core i7-10750H specs and review.