 |
Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-10600KF |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-10600KF and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, 7zip, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Blender, MATLAB, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, 3DMark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
And how good the processors are in games: - Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10600KF or Intel Core i9-13900T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900T | 66% |
Core i5-10600KF | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900T is 18% better than Core i5-10600KF. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900T | 63% |
Core i5-10600KF | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 111.1 | 96.5 | | Valorant | 126.3 | 109.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 70.7 | 61.4 | | Apex Legends | 118.7 | 103.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 94.7 | 82.2 | | Overwatch | 102.3 | 88.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.1 | 75.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.1 | 54.8 | | Warzone | 98.5 | 85.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 106.1 | 92.1 | | Valheim | 104.8 | 91.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900T | 188% |
Core i5-10600KF | 38% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10600KF since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 480 | 215 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5039 | 1615 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 799 | 501 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11203 | 3629 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2835 | 1391 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32236 | 10489 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | | Single-Core | 2591 | 2993 | | Multi-Core | 54945 | 14785 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | | Single-Core | 1974 | 1425 | | Multi-Core | 22682 | 8301 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | | Announcement date | January 24, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 6 | | Threads | 32 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 2460 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10600KF is 4% better than Core i9-13900T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900T has 18 more core than Core i5-10600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900T is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10600KF is better: 3
Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900T and Intel Core i5-10600KF before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Intel Core i5-10600KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
|
|
|
