 |
Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-11500T |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-11500T tests and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Handbrake, MATLAB, Prime95, PCMark 10, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, RealBench, PassMark, 7zip, 3DMark, WPrime, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11500T or Intel Core i9-13900T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900T | 66% |
Core i5-11500T | 55% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900T is 16% better than Core i5-11500T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900T | 63% |
Core i5-11500T | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 111.1 | 91.9 | | Valorant | 126.3 | 104.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 70.7 | 58.5 | | Apex Legends | 118.7 | 98.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 94.7 | 78.3 | | Overwatch | 102.3 | 84.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.1 | 72.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.1 | 52.2 | | Warzone | 98.5 | 81.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 106.1 | 87.7 | | Valheim | 104.8 | 86.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900T | 188% |
Core i5-11500T | 115% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11500T since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11500T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 480 | 173 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5039 | 1659 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 799 | 405 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11203 | 3716 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2835 | 1056 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32236 | 9838 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11500T | | Single-Core | 2591 | 2356 | | Multi-Core | 54945 | 17948 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11500T | | Single-Core | 1974 | 1212 | | Multi-Core | 22682 | 3792 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11500T | | Announcement date | January 24, 2023 | January 20, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rocket Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 1.5 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 6 | | Threads | 32 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 50 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900T is 61% better than Core i5-11500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900T has 18 more core than Core i5-11500T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900T is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11500T is better: 1
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900T and Intel Core i5-11500T before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Intel Core i5-11500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
|
|
|
