 |
Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-11600 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-11600 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, 3DMark, RealBench, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, PassMark, Gears 5, 7zip, MATLAB, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10.
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11600 or Intel Core i9-13900T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900T | 66% |
Core i5-11600 | 55% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900T is 16% better than Core i5-11600. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900T | 63% |
Core i5-11600 | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 111.1 | 94.8 | | Valorant | 126.3 | 107.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 70.7 | 60.3 | | Apex Legends | 118.7 | 101.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 94.7 | 80.8 | | Overwatch | 102.3 | 87.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.1 | 74.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.1 | 53.9 | | Warzone | 98.5 | 84.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 106.1 | 90.5 | | Valheim | 104.8 | 89.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900T | 188% |
Core i5-11600 | 41% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11600 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11600 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 480 | 189 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5039 | 1811 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 799 | 442 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11203 | 4058 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2835 | 1153 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32236 | 10741 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11600 | | Single-Core | 2591 | 2573 | | Multi-Core | 54945 | 19594 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11600 | | Single-Core | 1974 | 1541 | | Multi-Core | 22682 | 6664 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-11600 | | Announcement date | January 24, 2023 | January 20, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rocket Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 6 | | Threads | 32 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 50 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900T is 28% better than Core i5-11600 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900T has 18 more core than Core i5-11600. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900T is better: 36
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11600 is better: 1
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900T and Intel Core i5-11600 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13900T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Intel Core i5-11600 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
