 |
Intel Core i5-13600 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R |
|
Processor comparisons 12-11-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13600 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, WPrime, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6248R or Intel Core i5-13600.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600 | 63% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 61% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600 is 3% better than Xeon Gold 6248R. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600 | 59% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 70% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.2 | 124.8 | Valorant | 118.4 | 141.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.3 | 79.4 | Apex Legends | 111.3 | 133.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.8 | 106.4 | Overwatch | 95.9 | 114.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.7 | 97.9 | DOOM Eternal | 59.2 | 70.9 | Warzone | 92.3 | 110.6 | Assassin's Creed | 99.5 | 119.1 | Valheim | 98.3 | 117.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600 | 100% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 16% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6248R as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 383 | 226 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3979 | 6636 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 637 | 426 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8839 | 10753 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2241 | 1080 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 25423 | 27371 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 2048 | 2247 | Multi-Core | 43328 | 38405 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 1965 | 990 | Multi-Core | 15871 | 36095 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Announcement date | December 10, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Adler Lake | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 14 | 24 | Threads | 20 | 48 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 205 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | y | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600 is 14% better than Xeon Gold 6248R in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 6248R has 10 more core than Core i5-13600. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is better: 19 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600 and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|