|
Intel Core i5-13600 vs Intel Core i7-12800HL |
|
Processor comparisons 12-11-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13600 vs Intel Core i7-12800HL and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, PCMark 10, RealBench, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Prime95, Blender, Gears 5, PassMark, Blender, MATLAB, SuperPi. Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-12800HL or Intel Core i5-13600.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600 | 63% |
Core i7-12800HL | 60% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600 is 4% better than Core i7-12800HL. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600 | 59% |
Core i7-12800HL | 57% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.2 | 100.6 | Valorant | 118.4 | 114.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.3 | 64.0 | Apex Legends | 111.3 | 107.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.8 | 85.7 | Overwatch | 95.9 | 92.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.7 | 78.9 | DOOM Eternal | 59.2 | 57.1 | Warzone | 92.3 | 89.1 | Assassin's Creed | 99.5 | 96.0 | Valheim | 98.3 | 94.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600 | 100% |
Core i7-12800HL | 128% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-12800HL is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13600 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Core i7-12800HL | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 383 | 448 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3979 | 3274 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 637 | 1072 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8839 | 7432 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2241 | 2510 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 25423 | 24506 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Core i7-12800HL | Single-Core | 2048 | 5878 | Multi-Core | 43328 | 34310 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Core i7-12800HL | Single-Core | 1965 | 1738 | Multi-Core | 15871 | 12317 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600 |
Intel Core i7-12800HL | Announcement date | December 10, 2022 | September 28, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Embedded | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | Adler Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 14 | 14 | Threads | 20 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 45 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | y | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600 is 31% better than Core i7-12800HL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-12800HL is better: 6 Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600 and Intel Core i7-12800HL before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13600 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i7-12800HL Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX
| |
|