 |
AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, WPrime, Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, PassMark, Prime95, MATLAB, RealBench, 7zip, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6248R or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7773X | 74% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 61% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 17% better than Xeon Gold 6248R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7773X | 80% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 70% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 142.2 | 124.8 | Valorant | 161.6 | 141.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 79.4 | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 133.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 106.4 | Overwatch | 130.9 | 114.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 97.9 | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 70.9 | Warzone | 126.0 | 110.6 | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 119.1 | Valheim | 134.1 | 117.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7773X | 16% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 16% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 226 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 6636 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 426 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 10753 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 1080 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 27371 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 2797 | 2247 | Multi-Core | 79901 | 38405 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 1385 | 990 | Multi-Core | 53124 | 36095 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Milan | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 64 | 24 | Threads | 128 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-000000504 100-000000504​WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6248R is 26% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 40 more core than Xeon Gold 6248R. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is better: 5 All the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7773X and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|