|
Intel Core i7-13700T vs Intel Core i9-10910 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-13700T vs Intel Core i9-10910 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, PCMark 10, MATLAB, SuperPi, Blender, AIDA64, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Handbrake, 3DMark, 7zip, RealBench, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Furmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10910 or Intel Core i7-13700T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13700T | 64% |
Core i9-10910 | 56% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13700T is 12% better than Core i9-10910. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13700T | 58% |
Core i9-10910 | 55% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.3 | 98.4 | Valorant | 117.4 | 111.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.7 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 110.3 | 105.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.0 | 83.8 | Overwatch | 95.1 | 90.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.0 | 77.1 | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 55.9 | Warzone | 91.5 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 98.6 | 93.9 | Valheim | 97.4 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13700T | 190% |
Core i9-10910 | 34% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13700T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10910 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13700T |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 425 | 193 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4406 | 2303 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 705 | 511 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 9786 | 6021 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2480 | 1116 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28148 | 13966 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700T |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Single-Core | 2268 | 3073 | Multi-Core | 47973 | 22253 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700T |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Single-Core | 2003 | 1279 | Multi-Core | 14986 | 10152 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-13700T |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Announcement date | January 24, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 16 | 10 | Threads | 24 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Core i7-13700T has 6 more core than Core i9-10910. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700T is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10910 is better: 3 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Core i9-10910 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13700T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-10910 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
| |
|