 |
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs Intel Core i9-10910 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs Intel Core i9-10910 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, RealBench, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Furmark, 7zip, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Blender, SuperPi, Handbrake, AIDA64, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10910 or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 53% |
Core i9-10910 | 56% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10910 is 5% better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 53% |
Core i9-10910 | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.7 | 98.4 | | Valorant | 106.5 | 111.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.6 | 62.6 | | Apex Legends | 100.1 | 105.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.9 | 83.8 | | Overwatch | 86.3 | 90.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.5 | 77.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.2 | 55.9 | | Warzone | 83.1 | 87.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 89.5 | 93.9 | | Valheim | 88.4 | 92.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 65% |
Core i9-10910 | 34% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10910 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-10910 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 212 | 193 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1098 | 2303 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 513 | 511 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2577 | 6021 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1257 | 1116 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6434 | 13966 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-10910 | | Single-Core | 2728 | 3073 | | Multi-Core | 11825 | 22253 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-10910 | | Single-Core | 1275 | 1279 | | Multi-Core | 5598 | 10152 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-10910 | | Announcement date | October 23, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Renoir | Comet Lake | | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 10 | | Threads | 8 | 20 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 4000 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 256KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 4MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000001079
100-000001079MPK | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is 5% better than Core i9-10910 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10910 has 6 more core than Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10910 is better: 26
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G and Intel Core i9-10910 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
Intel Core i9-10910 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13300
|
|
|
