|
Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|
Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, 7zip, AIDA64, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, PassMark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, WPrime, 3DMark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Gears 5, Blender, Prime95, SuperPi. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or Intel Celeron 7305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron 7305 | 54% |
Ryzen 5 1600 | 53% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Celeron 7305 is 1% better than Ryzen 5 1600. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron 7305 | 53% |
Ryzen 5 1600 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.4 | 93.8 | Valorant | 106.2 | 106.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.4 | 59.7 | Apex Legends | 99.8 | 100.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.6 | 79.9 | Overwatch | 86.0 | 86.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.2 | 73.6 | DOOM Eternal | 53.1 | 53.3 | Warzone | 82.8 | 83.1 | Assassin's Creed | 89.2 | 89.5 | Valheim | 88.1 | 88.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron 7305 | 212% |
Ryzen 5 1600 | 47% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron 7305 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 1600 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 177 | 147 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1293 | 1094 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 423 | 357 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2936 | 2501 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 992 | 900 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 9678 | 6230 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Single-Core | 2321 | 2063 | Multi-Core | 13548 | 12340 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Single-Core | 957 | 932 | Multi-Core | 5313 | 5690 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | April 11, 2017 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 | Core name | Alder Lake-U | Summit Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 12 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 0.9 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 5 | 6 | Threads | 6 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 8200 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 576KB | L2 cache | | 3MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD1600BBM6IAE YD1600BBAEBOX YD1600BBAEMPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 1600 is 71% better than Celeron 7305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 5 1600 has 1 more core than Celeron 7305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 7305 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is better: 20 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Celeron 7305 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron 7305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13650HX
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
| |
|