|
Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|
Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Prime95, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Handbrake, Blender, Furmark, SuperPi, Gears 5, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB. Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 3300X or Intel Celeron 7305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron 7305 | 54% |
Ryzen 3 3300X | 53% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Celeron 7305 is 1% better than Ryzen 3 3300X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron 7305 | 53% |
Ryzen 3 3300X | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.4 | 93.8 | Valorant | 106.2 | 106.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.4 | 59.7 | Apex Legends | 99.8 | 100.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.6 | 79.9 | Overwatch | 86.0 | 86.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.2 | 73.5 | DOOM Eternal | 53.1 | 53.3 | Warzone | 82.8 | 83.1 | Assassin's Creed | 89.2 | 89.5 | Valheim | 88.1 | 88.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron 7305 | 212% |
Ryzen 3 3300X | 70% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron 7305 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 3 3300X since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 177 | 200 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1293 | 1129 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 423 | 495 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2936 | 2588 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 992 | 1267 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 9678 | 6754 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | Single-Core | 2321 | 2715 | Multi-Core | 13548 | 12815 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | Single-Core | 957 | 1382 | Multi-Core | 5313 | 5663 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Celeron 7305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | May 21, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 | Core name | Alder Lake-U | Matisse | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 12 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 0.9 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 5 | 4 | Threads | 6 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 8200 millions | 3800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 256KB | L2 cache | | 2MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000159 100-100000159BOX 100-100000159MPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 3300X is 76% better than Celeron 7305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron 7305 has 1 more core than Ryzen 3 3300X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron 7305 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is better: 25 However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Celeron 7305 and AMD Ryzen 3 3300X before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron 7305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13650HX
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|