 |
Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Core i9-10850K |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Core i9-10850K and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing, programming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Handbrake, AIDA64, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Blender, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Furmark, MATLAB, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10850K or Intel Xeon W-3175X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon W-3175X | 59% |
Core i9-10850K | 57% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon W-3175X is 3% better than Core i9-10850K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon W-3175X | 65% |
Core i9-10850K | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 116.1 | 99.8 | Valorant | 131.9 | 113.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 73.9 | 63.5 | Apex Legends | 124.0 | 106.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 98.9 | 85.1 | Overwatch | 106.9 | 91.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.0 | 78.3 | DOOM Eternal | 66.0 | 56.7 | Warzone | 102.9 | 88.5 | Assassin's Creed | 110.8 | 95.3 | Valheim | 109.5 | 94.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon W-3175X | 17% |
Core i9-10850K | 36% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10850K is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3175X as it consumes less power: 255W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 188 | 229 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5514 | 2616 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 417 | 536 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12975 | 6318 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1112 | 1367 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 31350 | 16820 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Single-Core | 2147 | 3074 | Multi-Core | 31909 | 23350 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Single-Core | 1351 | 1383 | Multi-Core | 27550 | 11578 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon W-3175X |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Announcement date | January 01, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Skylake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 2 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 28 | 10 | Threads | 56 | 20 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 7510 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 255 W | 125 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 512 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 38.5 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10850K is 13% better than Xeon W-3175X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon W-3175X has 18 more core than Core i9-10850K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3175X is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10850K is better: 12 Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon W-3175X and Intel Core i9-10850K before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon W-3175X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK
Intel Core i9-10850K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|