|
AMD Athlon 300GE vs Intel Core i7-7700HQ |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Athlon 300GE vs Intel Core i7-7700HQ tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as RealBench, MATLAB, WPrime, Blender, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, SuperPi, Furmark, 7zip, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator. And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-7700HQ or AMD Athlon 300GE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Athlon 300GE | 51% |
Core i7-7700HQ | 52% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-7700HQ is 1% better than Athlon 300GE. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Athlon 300GE | 51% |
Core i7-7700HQ | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.2 | 92.0 | Valorant | 102.5 | 104.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 96.4 | 98.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.9 | 78.4 | Overwatch | 83.1 | 84.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 72.1 | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 52.3 | Warzone | 80.0 | 81.6 | Assassin's Creed | 86.1 | 87.8 | Valheim | 85.1 | 86.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Athlon 300GE | 89% |
Core i7-7700HQ | 74% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon 300GE is more energy efficient than the Core i7-7700HQ as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Athlon 300GE |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 89 | 162 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 471 | 762 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 225 | 390 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1027 | 1701 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 580 | 961 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2791 | 4271 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon 300GE |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | Single-Core | 2097 | 2053 | Multi-Core | 4919 | 7006 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon 300GE |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | Single-Core | 942 | 1009 | Multi-Core | 2187 | 3936 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Athlon 300GE |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | October 01, 2016 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Picasso | Kaby Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 2 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2200 millions | 3300 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 45 W | Memory type | | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2667 | | Memory bandwidth | | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | 192KB | | L2 cache | 1MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YD30GEC6M2OFH
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Athlon 300GE is 17% better than Core i7-7700HQ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-7700HQ has 2 more core than Athlon 300GE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon 300GE is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-7700HQ is better: 29 Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Athlon 300GE and Intel Core i7-7700HQ before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Athlon 300GE Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K
Intel Core i7-7700HQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|