AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Processor comparisons   12-02-2023
   Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i7-7700HQ tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, 3DMark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, PassMark, RealBench, Gears 5, SuperPi, Blender, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Blender, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:

Halo Infinite
Valheim
Death Stranding
Watch Dogs Legion
Rainbow Six Siege
Fortnite
Fallout 76
Red Dead Redemption 2
Grand Theft Auto V
Cyberpunk 2077
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
DOOM: Eternal
Apex Legends
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Overwatch
Borderlands 3
Valorant
Last Man Standing
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-7700HQ or AMD Ryzen 7 3750H.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Ryzen 7 3750H

52%

Core i7-7700HQ

52%

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Ryzen 7 3750H

52%

Core i7-7700HQ

52%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	91.6	92.0
Valorant	104.1	104.6
Cyberpunk 2077	58.3	58.6
Apex Legends	97.9	98.3
Call of Duty Warzone	78.1	78.4
Overwatch	84.4	84.7
Red Dead Redemption 2	71.9	72.1
DOOM Eternal	52.1	52.3
Warzone	81.2	81.6
Assassin's Creed	87.5	87.8
Valheim	86.4	86.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Ryzen 7 3750H

80%

Core i7-7700HQ

74%

To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 3750H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-7700HQ since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Cinbench 15 Single-core	146	162
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	789	762
Cinbench 20 Single-core	367	390
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	1809	1701
Cinbench 23 Single-core	726	961
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	4215	4271

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Single-Core	2109	2053
Multi-Core	8435	7006

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Single-Core	849	1009
Multi-Core	3578	3936

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Announcement date	February 14, 2019	October 01, 2016
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Socket	FP5	FCBGA1440
Core name	Picasso	Kaby Lake
Architecture	Zen+	x86
Generation	3	7
Turbo Frequency	4 MHz	3.8 MHz
Frequency	2.3 MHz	2.8 MHz
Cores	4	4
Threads	8	8
Bus rate		8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	4600 millions	3300 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	35 W	45 W
Memory type		DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600
Max. Memory		64 Gb
Memory Frequency	2400
Memory bandwidth		37.5 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache		6 MB
Overclocking	No	Yes
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	YM3700C4T4MFG

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-7700HQ is 17% better than Ryzen 7 3750H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-7700HQ is better: 24
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H and Intel Core i7-7700HQ before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD Ryzen 7 3750H specs and review.

• Intel Core i7-7700HQ specs and review.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-6500U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850

Intel Core i7-7700HQ Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C