|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-8350K |
|
Processor comparisons 22-11-2022 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-8350K and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Blender, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, MATLAB, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, WPrime, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Handbrake, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, 3DMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-8350K or AMD Ryzen 3 2200G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% |
Core i3-8350K | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% |
Core i3-8350K | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.5 | 92.6 | Valorant | 104.0 | 105.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.3 | 58.9 | Apex Legends | 97.8 | 98.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.0 | 78.9 | Overwatch | 84.3 | 85.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.8 | 72.6 | DOOM Eternal | 52.0 | 52.6 | Warzone | 81.1 | 82.1 | Assassin's Creed | 87.4 | 88.4 | Valheim | 86.3 | 87.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 3 2200G | 53% |
Core i3-8350K | 48% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 2200G is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8350K as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 91W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8350K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 142 | 171 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 576 | 684 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 308 | 447 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1307 | 1711 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 942 | 887 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3587 | 3447 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8350K | Single-Core | 2075 | 2527 | Multi-Core | 6736 | 6896 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8350K | Single-Core | 1035 | 1318 | Multi-Core | 3473 | 4485 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8350K | Announcement date | February 12, 2018 | December 10, 2017 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1151 | Core name | Raven Ridge | Coffee Lake | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 8 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 91 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2400 | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | YD2200C5M4MFB | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8350K is 12% better than Ryzen 3 2200G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8350K is better: 26 The summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Core i3-8350K before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
Intel Core i3-8350K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Core i3-8100
| |
|