|
Intel Core i5-4690K vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-4690K vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PCMark 10, MATLAB, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, WPrime, PassMark, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, RealBench. And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Overwatch
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 2200G or Intel Core i5-4690K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-4690K | 51% |
Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 3 2200G is 1% better than Core i5-4690K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-4690K | 52% |
Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.2 | 91.5 | Valorant | 104.7 | 104.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 58.3 | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 97.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 78.0 | Overwatch | 84.8 | 84.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 71.8 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.0 | Warzone | 81.7 | 81.1 | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 87.4 | Valheim | 86.9 | 86.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-4690K | 44% |
Ryzen 3 2200G | 53% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 2200G is more energy efficient than the Core i5-4690K as it consumes less power: 88W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 142 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 534 | 576 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 351 | 308 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1287 | 1307 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 834 | 942 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2900 | 3587 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Single-Core | 2211 | 2075 | Multi-Core | 5590 | 6736 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Single-Core | 1163 | 1035 | Multi-Core | 4082 | 3473 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Announcement date | June 24, 2014 | February 12, 2018 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1150 | AM4 | Core name | Devil's Canyon | Raven Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 4 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 88 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2933 | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 384KB | L2 cache | | 2MB | L3 cache | 6 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD2200C5M4MFB | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-4690K is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is better: 12 All the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-4690K and AMD Ryzen 3 2200G before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
| |
|