 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-9300T |
|
Processor comparisons 22-11-2022
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-9300T tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, WPrime, Handbrake, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Furmark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, 7zip, 3DMark, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, AIDA64, Gears 5.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-9300T or AMD Ryzen 3 2200G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% |
Core i3-9300T | 51% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 3 2200G is 1% better than Core i3-9300T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% |
Core i3-9300T | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.5 | 91.5 | | Valorant | 104.0 | 103.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.3 | 58.2 | | Apex Legends | 97.8 | 97.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.0 | 78.0 | | Overwatch | 84.3 | 84.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.8 | 71.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.0 | 52.0 | | Warzone | 81.1 | 81.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.4 | 87.3 | | Valheim | 86.3 | 86.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 3 2200G | 53% |
Core i3-9300T | 94% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-9300T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 3 2200G as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-9300T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 142 | 157 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 576 | 618 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 308 | 417 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1307 | 1528 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 942 | 822 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3587 | 3192 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-9300T | | Single-Core | 2075 | 2335 | | Multi-Core | 6736 | 6386 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-9300T | | Single-Core | 1035 | 995 | | Multi-Core | 3473 | 3402 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-9300T | | Announcement date | February 12, 2018 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raven Ridge | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen | x86 | | Generation | 1 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 2400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 4MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | Yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | YD2200C5M4MFB | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 2200G is 8% better than Core i3-9300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9300T is better: 14
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Core i3-9300T before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1500X
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
Intel Core i3-9300T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
|
|
|
