|
AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon W-3245 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon W-3245 and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like 7zip, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Blender, Handbrake, PassMark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, MATLAB, 3DMark, Gears 5, Blender, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3245 or AMD EPYC 7573X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7573X | 68% |
Xeon W-3245 | 59% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7573X is 13% better than Xeon W-3245. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7573X | 73% |
Xeon W-3245 | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.7 | 104.0 | Valorant | 147.4 | 118.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.6 | 66.2 | Apex Legends | 138.6 | 111.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.6 | 88.6 | Overwatch | 119.4 | 95.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 81.5 | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 59.1 | Warzone | 115.0 | 92.2 | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 99.3 | Valheim | 122.4 | 98.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7573X | 19% |
Xeon W-3245 | 18% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7573X is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3245 since it has less power consumption: 240W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 179 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7427 | 5250 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 437 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15754 | 7444 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 824 | 1059 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40983 | 29849 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Single-Core | 1745 | 2538 | Multi-Core | 60122 | 30381 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Single-Core | 1400 | 1148 | Multi-Core | 40906 | 15680 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Milan | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 32 | 16 | Threads | 64 | 32 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 76000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 22 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000506 100-000000506​WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-3245 is 12% better than EPYC 7573X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7573X has 16 more core than Xeon W-3245. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7573X is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3245 is better: 10 Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7573X and Intel Xeon W-3245 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7573X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-3245 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|