Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7573X gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7573X

Processor comparisons   20-04-2023
   Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7573X tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Prime95, WPrime, Handbrake, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, SuperPi, Gears 5, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark.
   Gaming performance of processors in:
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Last Man Standing
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Fortnite
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Borderlands 3
  • Halo Infinite
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Fallout 76
  • Valheim
  • Valorant
  • Death Stranding
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Overwatch
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Apex Legends

   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7573X or AMD EPYC 7773X.

 
AMD EPYC 7773X
AMD EPYC 7573X

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7773X74% EPYC 7573X68%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 8% better than EPYC 7573X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7773X80% EPYC 7573X73%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite142.2129.7
Valorant161.6147.4
Cyberpunk 207790.582.6
Apex Legends151.9138.6
Call of Duty Warzone121.2110.6
Overwatch130.9119.4
Red Dead Redemption 2111.5101.7
DOOM Eternal80.873.7
Warzone126.0115.0
Assassin's Creed135.7123.8
Valheim134.1122.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7773X16% EPYC 7573X19%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7573X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7573X
Cinbench 15 Single-core248171
Cinbench 15 Multi-core98897427
Cinbench 20 Single-core481329
Cinbench 20 Multi-core2448515754
Cinbench 23 Single-core1115824
Cinbench 23 Multi-core5447440983

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7573X
Single-Core27971745
Multi-Core7990160122

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7573X
Single-Core13851400
Multi-Core5312440906

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7573X
Announcement dateMarch 22, 2022March 22, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP3
Core nameMilanMilan
ArchitectureZen 3Zen 3
Generation33
Turbo Frequency3.5 MHz3.6 MHz
Frequency2.2 MHz2.8 MHz
Cores6432
Threads12864
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count86000 millions76000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)280 W240 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32003200
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache768MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF
100-000000506
100-000000506​WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7573X is 21% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 32 more core than EPYC 7573X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7573X is better: 5
   However, it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7773X and AMD EPYC 7573X before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7773X - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7573X - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7573X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands