 |
AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as RealBench, Gears 5, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, WPrime, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Furmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Blender, Prime95, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 or AMD EPYC 7573X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7573X | 68% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 55% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7573X is 19% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7573X | 73% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 61% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 108.6 | | Valorant | 147.4 | 123.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.6 | 69.1 | | Apex Legends | 138.6 | 116.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.6 | 92.6 | | Overwatch | 119.4 | 100.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 85.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 61.7 | | Warzone | 115.0 | 96.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 103.7 | | Valheim | 122.4 | 102.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7573X | 19% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 20% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon E5-2697R v4 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7573X since it has less power consumption: 240W vs. 145W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 108 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7427 | 3177 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 240 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15754 | 7475 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 824 | 641 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40983 | 18061 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Single-Core | 1745 | 1916 | | Multi-Core | 60122 | 18383 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Single-Core | 1400 | 910 | | Multi-Core | 40906 | 20218 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | January 01, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA2011-3 | | Core name | Milan | Broadwell | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 18 | | Threads | 64 | 36 | | Bus rate | | 9.6 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 76000 millions | 4130 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 145 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400 | | Max. Memory | | 15 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 45 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000506
100-000000506​WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7573X is 17% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7573X has 14 more core than Xeon E5-2697R v4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7573X is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 is better: 8
Although it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7573X and Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7573X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
