|
AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, 3DMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Gears 5, Furmark, Blender, RealBench, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, WPrime, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Handbrake. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6246R or AMD EPYC 7573X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7573X | 68% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 59% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7573X is 13% better than Xeon Gold 6246R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7573X | 73% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.7 | 109.5 | Valorant | 147.4 | 124.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.6 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 138.6 | 117.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.6 | 93.4 | Overwatch | 119.4 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 85.9 | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 62.2 | Warzone | 115.0 | 97.1 | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 104.6 | Valheim | 122.4 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7573X | 19% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 16% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7573X is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6246R as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 179 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7427 | 5252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 397 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15754 | 12359 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 824 | 1059 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40983 | 29861 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1745 | 2365 | Multi-Core | 60122 | 30393 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1400 | 1041 | Multi-Core | 40906 | 21110 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Milan | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 32 | 16 | Threads | 64 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 76000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000506 100-000000506​WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6246R is 17% better than EPYC 7573X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7573X has 16 more core than Xeon Gold 6246R. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7573X is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6246R is better: 10 All the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7573X and Intel Xeon Gold 6246R before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7573X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|