|
AMD EPYC 9174F vs Intel Xeon W-3245 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9174F vs Intel Xeon W-3245 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Gears 5, Blender, Blender, RealBench, 3DMark, WPrime, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Furmark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3245 or AMD EPYC 9174F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9174F | 66% |
Xeon W-3245 | 59% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9174F is 10% better than Xeon W-3245. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9174F | 70% |
Xeon W-3245 | 59% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 123.8 | 104.0 | Valorant | 140.7 | 118.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 78.8 | 66.2 | Apex Legends | 132.2 | 111.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 105.5 | 88.6 | Overwatch | 113.9 | 95.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 97.1 | 81.5 | DOOM Eternal | 70.3 | 59.1 | Warzone | 109.7 | 92.2 | Assassin's Creed | 118.2 | 99.3 | Valheim | 116.7 | 98.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9174F | 18% |
Xeon W-3245 | 18% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9174F |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 134 | 179 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6722 | 5250 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 277 | 437 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14279 | 7444 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 727 | 1059 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 37179 | 29849 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9174F |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Single-Core | 1672 | 2538 | Multi-Core | 54549 | 30381 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9174F |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Single-Core | 1781 | 1148 | Multi-Core | 35081 | 15680 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9174F |
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Genoa | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 16 | 16 | Threads | 32 | 32 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 22 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000796 100-100000796WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9174F is 21% better than Xeon W-3245 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9174F is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3245 is better: 7 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9174F and Intel Xeon W-3245 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9174F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-3245 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|