|
Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Furmark, MATLAB, 7zip, PCMark 10, Blender, Gears 5, Blender, Handbrake, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, SuperPi, Prime95, AIDA64. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6248R or Apple M1 Pro.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Pro | 59% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 61% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6248R is 3% better than M1 Pro. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Pro | 57% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 70% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.0 | 124.8 | Valorant | 114.8 | 141.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 79.4 | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 133.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 106.4 | Overwatch | 93.0 | 114.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 97.9 | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 70.9 | Warzone | 89.5 | 110.6 | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 119.1 | Valheim | 95.3 | 117.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Pro | 358% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 16% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Pro is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6248R as it consumes less power: 16W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 304 | 226 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1716 | 6636 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 590 | 426 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2936 | 10753 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2233 | 1080 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11512 | 27371 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 5046 | 2247 | Multi-Core | 32596 | 38405 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 1723 | 990 | Multi-Core | 12737 | 36095 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Announcement date | October 07, 2021 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Server | Socket | M1 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Cascade Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 1 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 24 | Threads | 10 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 34000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 16 W | 205 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 24MB | | L3 cache | 24MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | APL1103 | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 Pro is 6% better than Xeon Gold 6248R in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 6248R has 14 more core than M1 Pro. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Pro is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is better: 22 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Apple M1 Pro and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Apple M1 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|