|
Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Core i9-13900 |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Core i9-13900 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as WPrime, SuperPi, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Furmark, UserBenchmark, PassMark, 3DMark, Prime95, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, AIDA64, 7zip, Blender, Gears 5. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900 or Apple M1 Pro.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Pro | 59% |
Core i9-13900 | 67% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900 is 11% better than M1 Pro. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Pro | 57% |
Core i9-13900 | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.0 | 110.5 | Valorant | 114.8 | 125.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 70.3 | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 118.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 94.2 | Overwatch | 93.0 | 101.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 86.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 62.8 | Warzone | 89.5 | 98.0 | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 105.5 | Valheim | 95.3 | 104.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Pro | 358% |
Core i9-13900 | 56% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900 since it has less power consumption: 16W vs. 115W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Core i9-13900 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 304 | 521 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1716 | 5424 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 590 | 865 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2936 | 12052 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2233 | 3054 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11512 | 34668 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Core i9-13900 | Single-Core | 5046 | 2791 | Multi-Core | 32596 | 59086 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Core i9-13900 | Single-Core | 1723 | 1965 | Multi-Core | 12737 | 22085 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Apple M1 Pro |
Intel Core i9-13900 | Announcement date | October 07, 2021 | December 13, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | M1 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Raptor Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 1 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | | 5.6 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 24 | Threads | 10 | 32 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 34000 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 16 W | 115 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 24MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 24MB | 36 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | APL1103 | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 Pro is 6% better than Core i9-13900 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900 has 14 more core than M1 Pro. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Pro is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900 is better: 32 Although it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Apple M1 Pro and Intel Core i9-13900 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Apple M1 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-13900 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|