|
AMD EPYC 9274F vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9274F vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Gears 5, WPrime, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Blender, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Blender. Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Valheim
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6248R or AMD EPYC 9274F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9274F | 69% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 61% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9274F is 11% better than Xeon Gold 6248R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9274F | 73% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 70% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.7 | 124.8 | Valorant | 147.4 | 141.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 79.4 | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 133.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 106.4 | Overwatch | 119.4 | 114.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 97.9 | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 70.9 | Warzone | 114.9 | 110.6 | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 119.1 | Valheim | 122.3 | 117.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 16% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9274F is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6248R since it has less power consumption: 320W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 154 | 226 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7827 | 6636 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 321 | 426 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16627 | 10753 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 846 | 1080 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 43295 | 27371 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 1946 | 2247 | Multi-Core | 63524 | 38405 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 2073 | 990 | Multi-Core | 40852 | 36095 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9274F |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Genoa | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 4.05 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 24 | 24 | Threads | 48 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000794 100-000000794WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 25% better than Xeon Gold 6248R in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is better: 6 Although it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9274F and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|