|
Intel Core i5-13420H vs Apple M1 Pro |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13420H vs Apple M1 Pro and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Gears 5, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, MATLAB, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Blender, AIDA64, RealBench, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Pro or Intel Core i5-13420H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13420H | 57% |
M1 Pro | 59% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Pro is 3% better than Core i5-13420H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13420H | 55% |
M1 Pro | 57% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.6 | 101.0 | Valorant | 110.9 | 114.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.1 | 64.3 | Apex Legends | 104.2 | 107.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 83.2 | 86.1 | Overwatch | 89.8 | 93.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.5 | 79.2 | DOOM Eternal | 55.4 | 57.4 | Warzone | 86.5 | 89.5 | Assassin's Creed | 93.1 | 96.4 | Valheim | 92.0 | 95.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13420H | 102% |
M1 Pro | 358% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13420H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 16W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13420H |
Apple M1 Pro | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 304 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2207 | 1716 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 342 | 590 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4922 | 2936 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1238 | 2233 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14181 | 11512 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13420H |
Apple M1 Pro | Single-Core | 1130 | 5046 | Multi-Core | 24178 | 32596 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13420H |
Apple M1 Pro | Single-Core | 1381 | 1723 | Multi-Core | 9395 | 12737 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13420H |
Apple M1 Pro | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | October 07, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | M1 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 10 | Threads | 12 | 10 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 34000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 16 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 12 MB | 24MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| APL1103 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13420H is 5% better than M1 Pro in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Pro has 2 more core than Core i5-13420H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13420H is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Pro is better: 26 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13420H and Apple M1 Pro before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13420H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Apple M1 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|