|
Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
|
Comparisons 16-07-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Unisoc T750 Tanggula or Snapdragon 850.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT750 Tanggula | 18% |
Snapdragon 850 | 20% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T750 Tanggula | 82% |
Snapdragon 850 | 65% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT750 Tanggula | 15% |
Snapdragon 850 | 19% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T750 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 850 | Total score | 251426 | 282308 | CPU | 70391 | 79039 | GPU | 95547 | 107274 | MEM | 40228 | 45171 | UX | 45262 | 50815 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T750 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 850 | Single-Core | 519 | 638 | Multi-Core | 2074 | 2236 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T750 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 850 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2960 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.96 GHz Kryo 385 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 34.1 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 768 KB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.1-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 850 is 32% better than T750 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 630 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 712 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.8 | 26.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 44.4 | 45.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.3 | 44.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.4 | 38.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.5 | 35.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.7 | 59.4 | Real Racing 3 | 69.6 | 56.4 | Sniper 3D | 75.2 | 98.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 63.5 | 62.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.4 | 71.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 51.7 | 49.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Qualcomm Spectra 280 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X20 LTE modem | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 1200 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T750 Tanggula is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 is better: 22 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T750 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|