 |
Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
|
Comparisons 16-07-2023 Detailed compare data of Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Unisoc T750 Tanggula or Snapdragon 4 Gen 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT750 Tanggula | 18% |
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | 39% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T750 Tanggula | 82% |
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | 88% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT750 Tanggula | 15% |
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | 38% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T750 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Total score | 251426 | 546249 | CPU | 70391 | 152941 | GPU | 95547 | 207568 | MEM | 40228 | 87399 | UX | 45262 | 98334 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T750 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Single-Core | 519 | 852 | Multi-Core | 2074 | 2555 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T750 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | 8000 millions | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A710 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x1, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 64 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is 9% better than T750 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 660 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 1486 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1200 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.8 | 28.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 44.4 | 58.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.3 | 54.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.4 | 54.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.5 | 45.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.7 | 71.1 | Real Racing 3 | 69.6 | 94.8 | Sniper 3D | 75.2 | 69.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 63.5 | 64.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.4 | 70.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 51.7 | 65.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X61 5G Modem-RF System | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Beidou, GPS, Galileo, SBAS, GLONASS, GNSS, QZSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T750 Tanggula is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is better: 31 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
T750 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|