|
Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs Unisoc SC79863a |
|
Comparisons 16-07-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs Unisoc SC79863a, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Unisoc T750 Tanggula or Unisoc SC79863a.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT750 Tanggula | 18% |
Unisoc SC79863a | 5% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T750 Tanggula | 82% |
Unisoc SC79863a | 37% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT750 Tanggula | 15% |
Unisoc SC79863a | 4% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T750 Tanggula |
Unisoc SC79863a | Total score | 251426 | 80874 | CPU | 70391 | 22639 | GPU | 95547 | 30740 | MEM | 40228 | 12930 | UX | 45262 | 14567 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T750 Tanggula |
Unisoc SC79863a | Single-Core | 519 | 209 | Multi-Core | 2074 | 942 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T750 Tanggula |
Unisoc SC79863a | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here T750 Tanggula is 19% better than Unisoc SC79863a in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG8322 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 510 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 146.2 | # of Cores | 2 | 128 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 44.4 | 15.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.3 | 27.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.4 | 16.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.5 | 12.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.7 | 15.6 | Real Racing 3 | 69.6 | 41.9 | Sniper 3D | 75.2 | 36.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 63.5 | 33.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.4 | 44.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 51.7 | 36.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | LTE-4 | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T750 Tanggula is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC79863a is better: 3 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T750 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Unisoc SC79863a SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|