|
Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs MediaTek Helio G36 |
|
Comparisons 16-07-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs MediaTek Helio G36, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy T750 Tanggula or Helio G36.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT750 Tanggula | 18% |
Helio G36 | 7% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T750 Tanggula | 82% |
Helio G36 | 72% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT750 Tanggula | 15% |
Helio G36 | 5% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T750 Tanggula |
Helio G36 | Total score | 251426 | 109300 | CPU | 70391 | 30606 | GPU | 95547 | 41543 | MEM | 40228 | 17493 | UX | 45262 | 19671 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T750 Tanggula |
Helio G36 | Single-Core | 519 | 223 | Multi-Core | 2074 | 983 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T750 Tanggula |
Helio G36 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio G36 is 9% better than T750 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 126.8 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 44.4 | 25.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.3 | 41.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.4 | 28.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.5 | 21.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.7 | 27.7 | Real Racing 3 | 69.6 | 83.8 | Sniper 3D | 75.2 | 91.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 63.5 | 75.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.4 | 48.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 51.7 | 50.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 50 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T750 Tanggula is better: 29
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G36 is better: 7 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
T750 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Helio G36 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|