 |
Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 |
|
Comparisons 16-07-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Unisoc T750 Tanggula vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy T750 Tanggula or Dimensity 6020.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT750 Tanggula | 18% |
Dimensity 6020 | 25% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T750 Tanggula | 82% |
Dimensity 6020 | 82% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT750 Tanggula | 15% |
Dimensity 6020 | 24% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T750 Tanggula |
Dimensity 6020 | Total score | 251426 | 348218 | CPU | 70391 | 97504 | GPU | 95547 | 132319 | MEM | 40228 | 55723 | UX | 45262 | 62679 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T750 Tanggula |
Dimensity 6020 | Single-Core | 519 | 702 | Multi-Core | 2074 | 1698 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T750 Tanggula |
Dimensity 6020 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 17.07 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 6020 is 9% better than T750 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 486 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.8 | 26.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 44.4 | 53.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.3 | 57.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.4 | 39.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.5 | 45.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.7 | 72.6 | Real Racing 3 | 69.6 | 85.2 | Sniper 3D | 75.2 | 91.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 63.5 | 91.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.4 | 65.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 51.7 | 68.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 2770 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | BeiDou B1I+B2a, Galileo E1+E5a, QZSS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T750 Tanggula is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6020 is better: 21 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T750 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Dimensity 6020 SoC Comparisons • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|