Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 vs Qualcomm 205 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 vs Qualcomm 205

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 vs Qualcomm 205, comparison of GPUs Adreno 304 and Adreno 306.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Qualcomm 205 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Octane V2, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 or Qualcomm 205 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
Qualcomm 205

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 400 MSM82281% Qualcomm 2052%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 400 MSM822827% Qualcomm 20530%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 400 MSM82281% Qualcomm 2051%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 Qualcomm 205
Total score2311135062
CPU64819817
GPU878313329
MEM36905612
UX41616311

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 Qualcomm 205
Single-Core6193
Multi-Core282428

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 Qualcomm 205
Frequency1600 MHz1100 MHz
Cores44
Bit6432
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)4 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR2/3LPDDR 2, LPDDR 3
Max. Memory2 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency533333
Memory bandwidth66
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 is 31% better than Qualcomm 205 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 306Adreno 304
GPU Frequency400 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS21.619.2
# of Cores
# of Shader Units2424
Display1280 x 800 pixels960 x 540 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile4.110.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)16.827.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra10.717.7
Call of Duty: Mobile9.914.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)13.723.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition21.235.6
Real Racing 313.422.1
Sniper 3D17.133.6
Need for Speed No Limits19.324.8
Mortal Kombat X15.525.7
CSR Racing 211.821.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP3 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon LTE modemQualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm 205 is better: 18
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 and Qualcomm 205, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Qualcomm 205 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731


Qualcomm 205 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands