|
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G95, speed examination of GPUs Apple A13 Bionic and Mali-G76 3EEMC4. This performance comparison involves two processors: A13 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm) and Helio G95 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy A13 Bionic or Helio G95 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA13 Bionic | 37% |
Helio G95 | 22% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A13 Bionic | 73% |
Helio G95 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA13 Bionic | 35% |
Helio G95 | 19% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A13 Bionic |
Helio G95 | Total score | 521807 | 308396 | CPU | 146108 | 86348 | GPU | 198279 | 117182 | MEM | 83491 | 49333 | UX | 93922 | 55511 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A13 Bionic |
Helio G95 | Single-Core | 1111 | 690 | Multi-Core | 3444 | 2348 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A13 Bionic |
Helio G95 | Frequency | 2660 MHz | 2050 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 8500 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.66 GHz Icestorm 4x1.6 GHz Firestorm | 2x2.05 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 10 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 48 KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A13 Bionic is 22% better than Helio G95 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A13 Bionic has 2 more core than Helio G95. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Apple A13 Bionic | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 | GPU Frequency | 2600 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 786 | 279 | # of Cores | 4 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 62.6 | 29.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 56.5 | 53.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 62.9 | 47.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 62.1 | 40.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 50.7 | 44.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 76.4 | 65.9 | Real Racing 3 | 125.8 | 94.6 | Sniper 3D | 138.4 | 104.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 88.1 | 56.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 100.6 | 54.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 81.8 | 52 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 12 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 12 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7660 LTE | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 225 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic is better: 35
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G95 is better: 5 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs A13 Bionic and Helio G95, as well as read the test results at the links below.
A13 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Exynos 2100 • Vs A12X Bionic • Vs Exynos 1080 • Vs Kirin 9000E • Vs Kirin 9000 • Vs Snapdragon 888 • Vs A12Z Bionic • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Helio G95 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|