 |
MediaTek MT8176 vs MediaTek Helio P35 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT8176 vs MediaTek Helio P35, compare of GPUs PowerVR GX6250 and PowerVR GE8320. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8176 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Helio P35 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MT8176 or Helio P35 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT8176 |
Helio P35 | Total score | 82111 | 85543 | CPU | 22987 | 23959 | GPU | 31198 | 32516 | MEM | 13130 | 13679 | UX | 14787 | 15397 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT8176 |
Helio P35 | Single-Core | 212 | 221 | Multi-Core | 956 | 996 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT8176 |
Helio P35 | Frequency | 2100 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8176 is 4% better than Helio P35 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8176 has 2 more core than Helio P35. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GX6250 | PowerVR GE8320 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 83.2 | 126.8 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 15.5 | 17.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 28.3 | 30.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 16.6 | 18.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.3 | 14.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 15.6 | 17.9 | Real Racing 3 | 42.5 | 60.8 | Sniper 3D | 36.8 | 39.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 34 | 42.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 45.3 | 39.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 36.8 | 42.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 20 MP | 25 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | 4K HEVC (h.265), H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Upload speed | | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8176 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P35 is better: 28 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT8176 and Helio P35, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT8176 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
Helio P35 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|